Selected public decisions identifying Bagga & Associates lawyers as counsel — a trial acquittal, allowed immigration appeals and cancelled roadside penalties. Each entry explains the matter, the outcome and who appeared, with a link to the original decision.
Past results are not necessarily indicative of future outcomes. Each case depends on its individual facts and circumstances.
Criminal Defence
Reported decision · Trial acquittal
R. v. Dhaliwal
2010 ABPC 57 · Provincial Court of Alberta
The accused testified at trial on sexual assault-related charges. Applying the reasonable-doubt framework for credibility cases, the Court found his evidence raised a doubt and dismissed both charges.
Spousal sponsorship appeal. The panel accepted the couple’s evidence about their relationship and day-to-day communication, found the marriage genuine, and allowed the appeal.
The decision lists Ravinder (Rob) Bagga as counsel for the appellant.
Sponsorship appeal allowed on humanitarian and compassionate grounds, with the best interests of the child directly affected weighing in favour of special relief. The visa refusal was set aside.
The decision lists Ravinder (Rob) Bagga as counsel for the appellant.
Spousal sponsorship appeal. The couple’s history together, money transfers and the development of their relationship showed a genuine and committed union. The appeal was allowed.
The decision lists Ravinder (Rob) Bagga as counsel for the appellant.
Spousal sponsorship appeal. Evidence of the relationship’s development, continued contact and financial support established a genuine marriage. The officer’s refusal was set aside.
The decision lists Ravinder (Rob) Bagga as counsel for the appellant.
Sponsorship appeal turning on an adoption under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act. The panel found the adoption created a genuine parent-child relationship and allowed the appeal.
The decision lists Ravinder (Rob) Bagga as counsel for the appellant.
Spousal sponsorship appeal. The appellant’s credible evidence answered the visa officer’s concerns about the match. The refusal was found invalid in law and the appeal was allowed.
The decision lists Ravinder Rob Bagga as counsel for the appellant.
Spousal sponsorship appeal. The panel found the marriage genuine and not entered into primarily to gain status under the Act. The visa refusal was set aside.
The decision lists Ravinder (Rob) Bagga as counsel for the appellant.
Fail-to-comply roadside sanction review. Medical evidence established a reasonable excuse — a lung condition prevented a suitable breath sample despite 18 attempts. The penalty was cancelled.
The decision lists Rohan Bagga as counsel and Ravinder (Rob) Bagga as senior counsel for the recipient.
Impaired operation review. The recipient was not advised in writing of the right to a roadside appeal and was unaware of it. The administrative penalty was cancelled.
The decision lists Rohan Bagga as counsel and Ravinder (Rob) Bagga as senior counsel for the recipient.
Fail-to-comply roadside sanction review. The evidence did not establish that the recipient failed or refused to comply with the breath demand. The penalty was cancelled.
The decision lists Rohan Bagga as counsel and Ravinder (Rob) Bagga as co-counsel for the recipient.
Fail-to-comply roadside sanction review. The officer did not give the recipient a reasonable opportunity to comply with the demand. The penalty was cancelled.
The decision lists Rohan Bagga as counsel for the recipient.
Impaired operation review. The Director did not provide the complete record required under the Provincial Administrative Penalties Act. The penalty was cancelled.
The decision lists Rohan Bagga as counsel for the recipient.
Fail-to-comply roadside sanction review. The adjudicator found the recipient did not fail or refuse to comply with the breath demand. The penalty was cancelled.
The decision lists Rohan Bagga as counsel for the recipient.
Impaired operation and over-80 review. The officer had not advised the recipient in writing of the right to a roadside appeal. Both bases of the penalty were cancelled.
The decision lists Rohan Bagga as counsel and Ravinder (Rob) Bagga as senior counsel and co-counsel for the recipient.
Fail-to-comply roadside sanction review. Late disclosure denied the recipient a fair opportunity to respond, and the penalty was cancelled on procedural fairness grounds.
The decision lists Rohan Bagga as counsel and Ravinder (Rob) Bagga as co-counsel for the recipient.