Meet Rohan
Rohan Bagga is a Barrister & Solicitor at Bagga & Associates in Calgary. His litigation-focused practice includes criminal defence, serious personal injury and immigration.
These matters can affect a client’s health, livelihood, family or future. The starting point is to understand the circumstances, examine the relevant documents and evidence, and identify the questions that need to be resolved.
Rohan’s work sits within the firm’s broader commitment to advocacy and client service. Whether a matter involves a criminal allegation, a serious injury claim or an immigration issue, a consultation helps clarify the proposed work and the next steps.
Courtroom & litigation experience
Rohan is named as counsel in the SafeRoads Alberta decisions below: roadside sanction reviews in which the Notice of Administrative Penalty was cancelled for the recipient.
The decisions provide a public record of counsel’s involvement and the tribunal’s reasoning. They are presented with their actual outcomes—not as a promise of success in another case.
Explore reported matters and CanLII decisions →Rohan Bagga’s Calgary legal practice
Calgary criminal defence lawyer
Rohan Bagga’s criminal law practice is part of the firm’s litigation-focused work. If you are facing an allegation or have an upcoming court appearance, contact the firm to discuss the charge, the stage of the proceedings and any release conditions or deadlines.
Explore criminal defence services →Serious personal injury & immigration
Rohan also assists with serious personal injury claims and immigration matters. Explain what has happened and provide any relevant correspondence or notices so the team can discuss the proposed scope of representation.
A practical approach to your matter
Identify the issues
Discuss what has happened, the current stage of the matter and the outcome the client is seeking.
Prepare the evidence
Work through the documents, records and information relevant to the claim, defence or application.
Explain the path forward
Consider available options, immediate priorities and what further work is needed before taking the next step.
Representative matters & reported cases
Past results are not necessarily indicative of future outcomes. Each case depends on its individual facts and circumstances.
Sran (Re)
Fail-to-comply roadside sanction review. Medical evidence established a reasonable excuse — a lung condition prevented a suitable breath sample despite 18 attempts. The penalty was cancelled.
The decision lists Rohan Bagga as counsel and Ravinder (Rob) Bagga as senior counsel for the recipient.
Read the decision on CanLIIDale (Re)
Impaired operation review. The recipient was not advised in writing of the right to a roadside appeal and was unaware of it. The administrative penalty was cancelled.
The decision lists Rohan Bagga as counsel and Ravinder (Rob) Bagga as senior counsel for the recipient.
Read the decision on CanLIIKundlas (Re)
Fail-to-comply roadside sanction review. The evidence did not establish that the recipient failed or refused to comply with the breath demand. The penalty was cancelled.
The decision lists Rohan Bagga as counsel and Ravinder (Rob) Bagga as co-counsel for the recipient.
Read the decision on CanLIISingh (Re)
Impaired operation review. The Director did not provide the complete record required for the review. The administrative penalty was cancelled.
The decision lists Rohan Bagga as counsel for the recipient.
Read the decision on CanLIISandhu (Re)
Impaired operation review. The Director failed to provide complete records as required, and the administrative penalty was cancelled in its entirety.
The decision lists Rohan Bagga as counsel for the recipient.
Read the decision on CanLIIGulati (Re)
Impaired operation and over-80 review. The Director’s disclosure was incomplete, and both bases of the administrative penalty were cancelled.
The decision lists Rohan Bagga as counsel for the recipient.
Read the decision on CanLIISingh (Re)
Fail-to-comply roadside sanction review. The officer did not give the recipient a reasonable opportunity to comply with the demand. The penalty was cancelled.
The decision lists Rohan Bagga as counsel for the recipient.
Read the decision on CanLIISingh (Re)
Impaired operation review. The Director did not provide the complete record required under the Provincial Administrative Penalties Act. The penalty was cancelled.
The decision lists Rohan Bagga as counsel for the recipient.
Read the decision on CanLIISingh (Re)
Impaired operation review. The recipient was not advised in writing of the right to a roadside appeal. The administrative penalty was cancelled.
The decision lists Rohan Bagga as counsel for the recipient.
Read the decision on CanLIIBhullar (Re)
Fail-to-comply roadside sanction review. The adjudicator found the recipient did not fail or refuse to comply with the breath demand. The penalty was cancelled.
The decision lists Rohan Bagga as counsel for the recipient.
Read the decision on CanLIIKullar (Re)
Impaired operation and over-80 review. The officer had not advised the recipient in writing of the right to a roadside appeal. Both bases of the penalty were cancelled.
The decision lists Rohan Bagga as counsel and Ravinder (Rob) Bagga as senior counsel and co-counsel for the recipient.
Read the decision on CanLIIDhaliwal (Re)
Fail-to-comply roadside sanction review. Late disclosure denied the recipient a fair opportunity to respond, and the penalty was cancelled on procedural fairness grounds.
The decision lists Rohan Bagga as counsel and Ravinder (Rob) Bagga as co-counsel for the recipient.
Read the decision on CanLIIPreparing for a consultation
Bring any court documents, notices, correspondence or other records connected to your matter. Let the firm know about upcoming dates and deadlines when you contact us.
A consultation allows the firm to assess the request and discuss scope and next steps. Contacting the firm does not, by itself, establish a lawyer-client relationship.